Human Intelligence Must Prevail — Not Merely Be Advised The recent decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Gummadi Usha Rani v. Sure Mallikarjuna Rao raises an uncomfortable but necessary question for the Indian judicial system:Can a judicial order

Artificial intelligence is now widely used by lawyers for research, drafting, and case preparation. While this has improved speed and access to information, it has also introduced a new professional risk—lazy prompting. Lazy prompting may appear harmless, but for lawyers

Artificial Intelligence is no longer optional for lawyers. It is already being used for legal research, drafting, case analysis, compliance checks, and client communication. Yet many lawyers feel that AI tools give inconsistent or unreliable results. In most cases, the

Artificial intelligence has quietly become part of a lawyer’s everyday work. Legal research, drafting, summarising judgments, preparing notes—tasks that once took hours are now completed in minutes. As more AI tools enter the market, lawyers are faced with a practical

Lawyers today are writing more than ever before—not just pleadings and opinions, but prompts for artificial intelligence tools, research queries, content for clients, and internal notes generated with the help of technology. As AI becomes part of everyday legal work,